Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pada Koperasi (Studi Kasus Pada Koperasi Mahasiswa Universitas X)

Authors

  • Suci Rahayu Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya
  • Sarifatul Hoiriyah Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya
  • Kana Kanari Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya
  • Devi Aulia Rahmawati Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya
  • Saprina Aulia Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya
  • Abdul Basit Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya
  • Gista Rismayani Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/jc.v2i2.265

Keywords:

Internal Control System, student coorperative, COSO, Agency Theory, Cooperative governance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the internal control system at the Student Cooperative (KOPMA) of X University using the COSO framework, grounded in Agency Theory proposed by Jensen & Meckling (1976) underpins this study by explaining the principal-agent relationship between cooperative members and management, where information asymmetry necessitates robust internal controls to limit opportunistic behavior. The research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with two key informants Treasurer and Public Relations and direct observation on May 24, 2026. Data analysis was conducted using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The results indicate that overall, the internal control system of Kopma has been implemented reasonably well. The control environment is established with a clear organizational structure, written SOPs, and a competency-based recruitment mechanism. Risk assessment is conducted through weekly reconciliation and biweekly evaluation meetings. Control activities are implemented through tiered authorization and transaction evidence verification, although the the segregation of authorization and recording functions has not been fully optimized. Information and communication operate through weekly and monthly reporting, yet digitalization remains limited. Monitoring is carried out at multiple levels, ranging from daily to annual through the Annual Members' Meeting (RAT). This study concludes that Kopma X has implemented most internal control components according to the COSO framework, with the need for improvement in the segregation of functions and digitalization of reporting systems.

References

Amanah, A., Asturi, P., & Nurdiwaty, D. (2022). Sistem Pengendalian Internal Untuk Meminimalkan Kredit Bermasalah Studi PT. Pegadaian (Persero) UPC Pare. Seminar Nasional Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 7(1), 138–143.

Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V, Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454.

Budiningrum, wening, E., & Subiyantoro, A. (2023). SISTEM INFORMASI AKUNTANSI KOPERASI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN DAYA SAING PENGELOLAAN KOPERASI. Jurnal Economina, 2(3).

COSO. (2013). Internal control integrated framework: Executive summary. Coso, May, 1–20.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory : An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

Fitria, A. (2024). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pengelolaan Danantara untuk Mencegah Potensi Korupsi. Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora (AJSH), 4(1), 124–134.

Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral Hazard and Observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320

I Gusti Ayu Anom Pradnyawati, I Wayan Suwendra, & I Nyoman Sujana. (2019). Analisis Sistem Akuntansi PenerimaanDan Pengeluaran Kas PadaKoperasi Pegawai Negeri Setya GrahaDi Kecamatan MendoyoTahun 2017. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha , Volume 11(1), 249–259.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976a). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305--360.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976b). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership, 77–132.

Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM. (2024). 8 Koperasi Bermasalah Gagal Bayar Rp26 Triliun, Kemenkop UKM: Baru Dibayar Rp 3,4 Triliun. Tempo,Co. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/8-koperasi-bermasalah-gagal-bayar-rp26-triliun-kemenkop-ukm-baru-dibayar-rp-3-4-triliun-34173

Nona Dince, M., Yecci Noeng, A., & Sabon, F. (2022). Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Internal Atas Sistem Penggajian Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Kopdit Suru Pudi. Accounting UNIPA - Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59603/accounting.v1i2.138

Novitaningrum Diah. (2024). Analisis & Perancangan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Pada Koperasi Mahasiswa Uny. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Pajak Keuangan, 2(3), 1–12.

Rato, M. E. Da, Mitan, W., & Lamawitak, P. L. (2023). Peran Badan Pengawas Koperasi Dalam Pengelolaan Koperasi Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Sistem Pengendalian Internal (Studi Kasus Pada KSP Kopdit Suru Pudi Koting). Jurnal Mutiara Ilmu Akuntansi, 1(1), 238–250.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10

How to Cite

Rahayu, S., Hoiriyah, S., Kanari, K., Rahmawati, D. A., Aulia, S., Basit, A., & Rismayani, G. (2026). Analisis Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pada Koperasi (Studi Kasus Pada Koperasi Mahasiswa Universitas X) . J-Coop : Journal of Co-Operative, 2(2), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.32670/jc.v2i2.265