Dynamic Capability dalam Memperkuat Cooperative Identity dan Keberlanjutan Koperasi: Sebuah Integrative Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32670/jc.v2i2.353Keywords:
Dynamic Capability; Cooperative Identity; Cooperative Sustainability; Integrative Literature Review; Cooperative Management.Abstract
Rapid changes in the business environment driven by digitalization, globalization, technological advancement, and increasing market complexity require cooperatives to enhance their adaptive capacity while preserving their identity as member-based organizations. In this context, dynamic capability has emerged as a strategic concept that enables organizations to sense environmental changes, seize opportunities, and transform organizational resources continuously. Nevertheless, studies examining the relationship between dynamic capability, cooperative identity, and cooperative sustainability remain fragmented. This study aims to synthesize the existing literature to explain the role of dynamic capability in strengthening cooperative identity and promoting cooperative sustainability.
This study employs an Integrative Literature Review by examining scholarly articles, academic books, and institutional reports collected from reputable academic databases. Data were analyzed using content analysis and thematic analysis to identify key themes, conceptual relationships, and research gaps.
The findings indicate that dynamic capability contributes to cooperative sustainability through three interrelated dimensions: sensing, seizing, and transforming. These capabilities enable cooperatives to improve innovation, organizational adaptability, and governance quality in responding to environmental changes. Furthermore, the review identifies cooperative identity as a conceptual mechanism linking dynamic capability and cooperative sustainability. Organizational transformation generates sustainable outcomes only when it remains grounded in cooperative values, principles, democratic governance, and member participation.
This study contributes by proposing an integrated conceptual framework connecting dynamic capability, cooperative identity, and cooperative sustainability. The proposed framework extends the application of dynamic capability theory within the cooperative context and offers practical insights for developing adaptive, innovative, and identity-based cooperative transformation strategies.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell Publishing.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Birchall, J. (2011). People-Centred Businesses: Cooperatives, Mutuals and the Idea of Membership. Palgrave Macmillan.
Birchall, J., & Simmons, R. (2004). What motivates members to participate in cooperative and mutual businesses? Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(3), 465–495.
International Cooperative Alliance. (2023). Statement on the Cooperative Identity.
Novković, S. (2008). Defining the cooperative difference. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2168–2177.
Novković, S., & Miner, K. (2015). Co-operative Governance Fit to Build Resilience in the Face of Complexity. International Co-operative Alliance.
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.
Cornforth, C. (2004). The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(1), 11–32.
Forcadell, F. J. (2005). Democracy, cooperation and business success: The case of the Mondragon Corporación Cooperativa. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3), 255–274.
Nilsson, J. (2018). Governance costs and the problems of large traditional cooperatives. Outlook on Agriculture, 47(2), 87–92.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iwan Mulyana, Tryiis ARR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
